The highlight of the day came with
scholarly presentations by Professor Roger Watson and Professor Kate
Galvin. Roger’s paper ‘Nursing
Leadership Style or Substance’ was a robust and trenchant critique of the
national leadership of nursing (or lack of it) in the UK profession and
explored the roles of the Nursing and Midwifery Council, the Royal College of
Nursing, and the Council of Deans of Health.
Kate’s paper discussed the question ‘What does humanising care
mean’? Her answers to this question
reflected many years of empirically and philosophically grounded research into
ways of preventing the de-humanisation of older people and others who are
dependent on healthcare. The
presentations stimulated a passionate debate between the presenters, faculty
staff and visiting colleagues, who recognised that both leadership and
strategies to humanise care are essential as the profession responds to the
challenge of the Francis Report.
The day had begun with a closed business
meeting of Phi Mu, chaired by Professor Elizabeth Rosser. As a recent recruit to the organisation I was
interested to learn that it is seeking to extend its influence in the UK
nursing scene. A conference is to be
held in June at which new members will be inducted, and scholarly papers
read. As I reflected on the day I was
encouraged to have spent the day with a group of people who clearly value
excellence in scholarship, and seek to promote these values in the next
generation of professionals. Another
very valuable aspect of the Honour Society’s work is that it is an international
organisation with a growing European presence.
If you would like to find out more about
Phi Mu, the English chapter of the Honour Society of Nursing, go to http://hsc.bournemouth.ac.uk/phimuchapter/index.html,
or speak to myself, Roger Watson, Kate Galvin or Steve Ersser, all of whom are
members.
Peter Draper
No comments:
Post a Comment